EPYC 4364P vs EPYC 7301

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
9.44
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
22.61
+140%

EPYC 4364P outperforms EPYC 7301 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking810234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9945.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency5.2620.38
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4364P has 2210% better value for money than EPYC 7301.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size213 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.44
EPYC 4364P 22.61
+140%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
EPYC 4364P 35909
+140%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.44 22.61
Recency 20 June 2017 21 May 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 139.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 47.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7301 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.