Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs EPYC 7301

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7301
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
9.80
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
2023
10 cores / 10 threads, 2424 Watt
14.20
+44.9%

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core outperforms EPYC 7301 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking800535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.14no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M-Series
Power efficiency5.26no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)no data
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$825no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3210
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96K (per core)7.3 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt2424 ‑ 3696 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7301 9.80
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 14.20
+44.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7301 14991
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core 21726
+44.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.80 14.20
Recency 29 June 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 2424 Watt

EPYC 7301 has 60% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and 1325.9% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has a 44.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7301 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7301 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 110 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7301 or Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.