Xeon W-3365 vs EPYC 7282

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
19.18
Xeon W-3365
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
37.17
+93.8%

Xeon W-3365 outperforms EPYC 7282 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30687
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.32no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.1313.03
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7282 19.18
Xeon W-3365 37.17
+93.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7282 30474
Xeon W-3365 59038
+93.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.18 37.17
Recency 7 August 2019 29 July 2021
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 270 Watt

EPYC 7282 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3365, on the other hand, has a 93.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon W-3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7282 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7282 and Xeon W-3365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282
Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 50 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7282 or Xeon W-3365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.