i7-11700KF vs EPYC 7262

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.13
Core i7-11700KF
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
15.11
+15.1%

Core i7-11700KF outperforms EPYC 7262 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking571465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.65no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.9811.39
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$575no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7262 13.13
i7-11700KF 15.11
+15.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7262 20779
i7-11700KF 23919
+15.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.13 15.11
Recency 7 August 2019 16 March 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 7262 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

i7-11700KF, on the other hand, has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 24% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-11700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7262 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-11700KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7262 and Core i7-11700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262
Intel Core i7-11700KF
Core i7-11700KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 526 votes

Rate Core i7-11700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7262 or Core i7-11700KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.