EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7251

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7251
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
9.40
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
43.84
+366%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7251 by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking80648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.82no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.4114.82
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$574no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier2126
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth153.652 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7251 9.40
EPYC 7H12 43.84
+366%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7251 14935
EPYC 7H12 69633
+366%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 43.84
Recency 29 June 2017 18 September 2019
Physical cores 8 64
Threads 16 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7251 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has a 366.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7251 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7251 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7251 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.