Celeron N6211 vs EPYC 7251

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	806	2197
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.80	3.33
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	AMD EPYC	Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency	7.41	20.59
Architecture codename	Naples (2017−2018)	Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date	29 June 2017 (7 years ago)	17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$574	$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 19% better value for money than EPYC 7251.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	16	2
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	3 GHz
Multiplier	21	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	1.5 MB
L3 cache	32 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Die size	192 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	70 °C
Number of transistors	4,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	no data
Socket	TR4	BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4
Maximum memory size	2 TiB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	153.652 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	128	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	9.44	1.42
Recency	29 June 2017	17 July 2022
Physical cores	8	2
Threads	16	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7251 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---