Ryzen 5 7400F vs EPYC 4584PX

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking87not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.56no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency29.58no data
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2025)Raphael (2023−2025)
Release date21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)9 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3212
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size2x 71 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)47 °C61 °C
Number of transistors17,840 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon GraphicsN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2824

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 May 2024 9 January 2025
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 32 12
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 4584PX has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7400F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
Ryzen 5 7400F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 4584PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 33 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 4584PX and Ryzen 5 7400F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.