VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 vs EPYC 4564P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 71 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 55.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 21.75 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | CNR (2015) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 46 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM5 | VIA nanoBGA2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 18 Watt |
EPYC 4564P has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
VIA Nano QuadCore C4650, on the other hand, has 844.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation processor while VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4564P and VIA Nano QuadCore C4650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
