i7-14701TE vs EPYC 4344P
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 241 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 49.86 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 31.59 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,570 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 1.98 | 6.15 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
EPYC 4344P has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
i7-14701TE, on the other hand, has 210.6% faster integrated GPU, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 4344P is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-14701TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4344P and Core i7-14701TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
