Celeron G1101 vs E2-9010

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.68
Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.68

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27872793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.97
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.320.89
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.27 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel HD
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and Celeron G1101.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes81

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-9010 0.68
Celeron G1101 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9010 1093
+0.6%
Celeron G1101 1086

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 73 Watt

E2-9010 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 630% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-9010 and Celeron G1101.

Be aware that E2-9010 is a notebook processor while Celeron G1101 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 33 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-9010 and Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.