Celeron 897 vs E2-9000

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and Celeron 897 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2786not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.77no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and Celeron 897 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and Celeron 897 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and Celeron 897. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and Celeron 897 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and Celeron 897. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

E2-9000 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-9000 and Celeron 897. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9000 and Celeron 897, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
Intel Celeron 897
Celeron 897

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 311 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron 897 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9000 or Celeron 897, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.