Celeron E3400 vs E2-7110

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-7110
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.44
+167%
Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.54

E2-7110 outperforms Celeron E3400 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21932852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency9.040.78
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)17 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C74 °C
Number of transistors930 Million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)12-15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Celeron E3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Celeron E3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-7110 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Celeron E3400.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-7110 1.44
+167%
Celeron E3400 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-7110 2282
+165%
Celeron E3400 860

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-7110 185
Celeron E3400 290
+56.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-7110 537
+10.7%
Celeron E3400 485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 0.54
Recency 7 May 2015 17 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 65 Watt

E2-7110 has a 166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 441.7% lower power consumption.

The E2-7110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-7110 is a notebook processor while Celeron E3400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Celeron E3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-7110
E2-7110
Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 227 votes

Rate E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 273 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-7110 or Celeron E3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.