Celeron 450 vs E2-7110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-7110 and Celeron 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency9.05no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-7110 and Celeron 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C60 °C
Number of transistors930 Million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on E2-7110 and Celeron 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)12-15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

E2-7110 and Celeron 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Celeron 450 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Celeron 450.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-7110 2282
+436%
Celeron 450 426

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-7110 184
+15.7%
Celeron 450 159

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-7110 536
+233%
Celeron 450 161

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

E2-7110 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-7110 and Celeron 450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-7110 is a notebook processor while Celeron 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Celeron 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-7110
E2-7110
Intel Celeron 450
Celeron 450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 226 votes

Rate E2-7110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 44 votes

Rate Celeron 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-7110 or Celeron 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.