Athlon 650 vs E2-7110
Primary details
Comparing E2-7110 and Athlon 650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2178 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 9 August 1999 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $849 |
Detailed specifications
E2-7110 and Athlon 650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 0.65 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 184 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-7110 and Athlon 650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-15 Watt | 48 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-7110 and Athlon 650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-7110 and Athlon 650 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-7110 and Athlon 650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR1 |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | N/A |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-7110 and Athlon 650 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-7110 and Athlon 650 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-7110 and Athlon 650.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 May 2015 | 9 August 1999 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 48 Watt |
E2-7110 has an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E2-7110 and Athlon 650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E2-7110 is a notebook processor while Athlon 650 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-7110 and Athlon 650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
