Celeron N2910 vs E2-6110

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-6110
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.74
+45.1%

E2-6110 outperforms Celeron N2910 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26872880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.506.64
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and Celeron N2910. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and Celeron N2910. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8.79 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-6110 and Celeron N2910 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and Celeron N2910.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-6110 0.74
+45.1%
Celeron N2910 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-6110 1128
+45%
Celeron N2910 778

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.51
Recency 29 April 2014 11 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

E2-6110 has a 45.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

Celeron N2910, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The E2-6110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2910 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and Celeron N2910, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-6110
E2-6110
Intel Celeron N2910
Celeron N2910

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron N2910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-6110 or Celeron N2910, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.