Celeron 827 vs E2-6110
Primary details
Comparing E2-6110 and Celeron 827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2689 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD E-Series | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 4.50 | no data |
Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-6110 and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 14 |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 504 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-6110 and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FT3b | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and Celeron 827 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-6110 and Celeron 827 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and Celeron 827.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
E2-6110 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E2-6110 and Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and Celeron 827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.