A4-5050 vs E2-6110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-6110
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.74

A4-5050 outperforms E2-6110 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-6110 and A4-5050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26922572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency4.505.29
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 February 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-6110 and A4-5050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-6110 and A4-5050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFT3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and A4-5050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and A4-5050 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and A4-5050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8330
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and A4-5050 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-6110 and A4-5050 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and A4-5050.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-6110 0.74
A4-5050 0.87
+17.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-6110 1128
A4-5050 1328
+17.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.87
Recency 29 April 2014 1 February 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

E2-6110 has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A4-5050, on the other hand, has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The A4-5050 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-6110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and A4-5050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-6110
E2-6110
AMD A4-5050
A4-5050

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate A4-5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-6110 or A4-5050, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.