Sempron LE-1150 vs E2-3200

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2780not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.88no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Sparta (2007)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)August 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370Dno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3200 968
+286%
Sempron LE-1150 251

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

E2-3200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron LE-1150, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Sempron LE-1150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
AMD Sempron LE-1150
Sempron LE-1150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 80 votes

Rate Sempron LE-1150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3200 or Sempron LE-1150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.