Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs E2-3200

Aggregate performance score

E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.62
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
7.02
+1032%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE outperforms E2-3200 by a whopping 1032% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27831010
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency0.8918.63
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size228 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370DAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3200 0.62
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 7.02
+1032%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3200 968
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 10943
+1030%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3200 298
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 1492
+401%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3200 525
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 4813
+817%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 7.02
Recency 7 September 2011 21 July 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE has a 1032.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3200 or Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.