Pentium III 1266S vs E2-3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2785not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.89no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release date7 September 2011 (13 years ago)July 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.27 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)8 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size228 mm280 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1370
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370Dno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3200 968
+213%
Pentium III 1266S 309

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

E2-3200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium III 1266S, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and Pentium III 1266S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
Intel Pentium III 1266S
Pentium III 1266S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Pentium III 1266S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3200 or Pentium III 1266S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.