N100 vs E2-3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.63

N100 outperforms E2-3200 by a whopping 465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3200 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27171481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date7 September 2011 (12 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3200 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHzno data
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on E2-3200 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3200 and N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3200 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6370Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3200 and N100.

PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3200 0.63
N100 3.56
+465%

N100 outperforms E2-3200 by 465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

E2-3200 968
N100 5513
+470%

N100 outperforms E2-3200 by 470% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 3.56
Recency 7 September 2011 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has a 465.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3200 in performance tests.

Note that E2-3200 is a desktop processor while N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3200 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3200
E2-3200
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 125 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3200 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.