Ryzen 7 5825U vs E2-3000M

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiencyno data72.89
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size228 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380GMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6380GAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
Ryzen 7 5825U 18353
+2647%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-3000M 231
Ryzen 7 5825U 1725
+647%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-3000M 426
Ryzen 7 5825U 6329
+1386%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-3000M 1597
Ryzen 7 5825U 6304
+295%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-3000M 3014
Ryzen 7 5825U 32641
+983%

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.52 9.02
Recency 20 December 2011 6 January 2022
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 5825U has 1634.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 674 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.