Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs E2-3000M

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Detailed specifications

E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.1/2, 3DNow, Radeon HD 6380Gno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6380Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000M 668
+30.7%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 511

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-3000M 1597
+0.1%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 1596

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-3000M 3014
+4.7%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 2879

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 December 2011 20 August 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

E2-3000M has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo SU9400, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000M and Core 2 Duo SU9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
Core 2 Duo SU9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 54 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000M or Core 2 Duo SU9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.