EPYC 7763 vs E2-3000

VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated25
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.15
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data17.99
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data24.5
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8280N/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and EPYC 7763 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and EPYC 7763 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and EPYC 7763.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000 726
EPYC 7763 84557
+11547%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

E2-3000 has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7763, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-3000 and EPYC 7763. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-3000 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.