A4-9120C vs E2-3000

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.46
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54
+17.4%

A4-9120C outperforms E2-3000 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-3000 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29422858
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.908.52
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-3000 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-3000 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-3000 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXVirtualization,
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-3000 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-3000 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8280AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-3000 and A4-9120C integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-3000 and A4-9120C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-3000 and A4-9120C.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-3000 0.46
A4-9120C 0.54
+17.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-3000 726
A4-9120C 850
+17.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.54
Integrated graphics card 0.68 1.17
Recency 23 May 2013 6 January 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

A4-9120C has a 17.4% higher aggregate performance score, 72.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120C is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-3000 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-3000
E2-3000
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 80 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-3000 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.