Ryzen 9 5900X vs E2-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiencyno data22.19
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)8 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.75 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size75 mm22x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data0 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallAM4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7340-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-2000 496
Ryzen 9 5900X 39115
+7786%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-2000 144
Ryzen 9 5900X 2209
+1434%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-2000 270
Ryzen 9 5900X 11962
+4330%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2013 8 October 2020
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 105 Watt

E2-2000 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E2-2000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-2000 and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-2000
E2-2000
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 55 votes

Rate E2-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3665 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-2000 or Ryzen 9 5900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.