Celeron N2810 vs E2-1800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-1800
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.28
+16.7%
Celeron N2810
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.24

E2-1800 outperforms Celeron N2810 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-1800 and Celeron N2810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31323180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.473.24
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$260

Detailed specifications

E2-1800 and Celeron N2810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm22 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-1800 and Celeron N2810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-1800 and Celeron N2810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

E2-1800 and Celeron N2810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-1800 and Celeron N2810 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-1800 and Celeron N2810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7340Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-1800 and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-1800 and Celeron N2810.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-1800 0.28
+16.7%
Celeron N2810 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-1800 449
+19.1%
Celeron N2810 377

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E2-1800 108
Celeron N2810 151
+39.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E2-1800 181
Celeron N2810 274
+51.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E2-1800 1110
+11.8%
Celeron N2810 993

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E2-1800 2121
+43.9%
Celeron N2810 1474

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E2-1800 1083
+3.8%
Celeron N2810 1043

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E2-1800 69.05
Celeron N2810 63.4
+8.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E2-1800 1
Celeron N2810 1
+12.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

E2-1800 0.33
Celeron N2810 0.37
+12.1%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

E2-1800 0.1
Celeron N2810 0.1
+10%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

E2-1800 486
Celeron N2810 680
+39.9%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

E2-1800 3
Celeron N2810 4
+30.7%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

E2-1800 18
Celeron N2810 23
+24.5%

Geekbench 2

E2-1800 1781
Celeron N2810 1898
+6.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.24
Integrated graphics card 0.40 0.77
Recency 6 June 2012 11 September 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 7 Watt

E2-1800 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2810, on the other hand, has 92.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

The E2-1800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2810 in performance tests.

Note that E2-1800 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2810 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-1800 and Celeron N2810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-1800
E2-1800
Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 166 votes

Rate E2-1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-1800 or Celeron N2810, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.