E1-2200 vs Celeron N2810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2810
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.24
E1-2200
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.30
+25%

E1-2200 outperforms Celeron N2810 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31813118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD E-Series
Power efficiency3.243.15
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)5 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$260no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.05 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FT3
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and E1-2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and E1-2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon HD 8210
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2810 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and E1-2200.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes48
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2810 0.24
E1-2200 0.30
+25%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2810 377
E1-2200 474
+25.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 0.30
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.49
Recency 11 September 2013 5 November 2013
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 9 Watt

Celeron N2810 has 57.1% faster integrated GPU, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

E1-2200, on the other hand, has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

The E1-2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2810 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and E1-2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810
AMD E1-2200
E1-2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate E1-2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2810 or E1-2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.