Ryzen 5 4500 vs E1-7010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-7010
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.38
Ryzen 5 4500
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.05
+2545%

Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms E1-7010 by a whopping 2545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3086809
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.65
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.6214.73
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors930 Million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4-3200
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsN/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E1-7010 0.38
Ryzen 5 4500 10.05
+2545%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 607
Ryzen 5 4500 16128
+2557%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-7010 129
Ryzen 5 4500 1559
+1109%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-7010 219
Ryzen 5 4500 6214
+2737%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 10.05
Recency 7 May 2015 4 April 2022
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

E1-7010 has 550% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 4500, on the other hand, has a 2544.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-7010 in performance tests.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 4500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
Ryzen 5 4500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 229 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2440 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E1-7010 and Ryzen 5 4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.