FX-6130 vs E1-7010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-7010
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37
FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.74
+641%

FX-6130 outperforms E1-7010 by a whopping 641% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and FX-6130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30211692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.502.73
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and FX-6130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data288 KB
L2 cache1024 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and FX-6130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and FX-6130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and FX-6130 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and FX-6130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and FX-6130 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and FX-6130 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and FX-6130.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-7010 0.37
FX-6130 2.74
+641%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 593
FX-6130 4353
+634%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 2.74
Recency 7 May 2015 23 October 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 95 Watt

E1-7010 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

FX-6130, on the other hand, has a 640.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The FX-6130 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-7010 in performance tests.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while FX-6130 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and FX-6130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD FX-6130
FX-6130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or FX-6130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.