Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs E1-7010
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms E1-7010 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3021 | 2958 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD E-Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 3.50 | 1.16 |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| Recency | 7 May 2015 | 1 May 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
E1-7010 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
Celeron Dual-Core T1400, on the other hand, has a 16.2% higher aggregate performance score.
The Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-7010 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
