Atom N2800 vs E1-7010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and Atom N2800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Atom
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$47

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and Atom N2800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and Atom N2800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Atom N2800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

E1-7010 and Atom N2800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Atom N2800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Atom N2800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4.88 GB
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Atom N2800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and Atom N2800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Atom N2800.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 593
+33.6%
Atom N2800 444

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2015 1 December 2011
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

E1-7010 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N2800, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and Atom N2800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Atom N2800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 104 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or Atom N2800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.