Athlon MP 2000+ vs E1-7010
Primary details
Comparing E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD E-Series | AMD Athlon MP |
Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | K7 (2000−2004) |
Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 27 August 2002 (22 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $319 |
Detailed specifications
E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
Bus type | no data | FSB |
Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 12.5 |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 256 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | no data | 85 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 930 Million | 37 Million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FP4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 58.2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1333 | no data |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+ integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 May 2015 | 27 August 2002 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 58 Watt |
E1-7010 has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 480% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 2000+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and Athlon MP 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.