Ryzen 3 7320U vs E1-6010

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiencyno data35.17
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm6 nm
Die size107 mm2100 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bFP6
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon 610M
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes84

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 536
Ryzen 3 7320U 8847
+1551%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-6010 127
Ryzen 3 7320U 1158
+812%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-6010 220
Ryzen 3 7320U 3615
+1543%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

E1-6010 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 561 vote

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 665 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.