Atom S1260 vs E1-6010
Aggregate performance score
E1-6010 outperforms Atom S1260 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E1-6010 and Atom S1260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3065 | 3073 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.22 | 3.47 |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Centerton (2012) |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $64 |
Detailed specifications
E1-6010 and Atom S1260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.35 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E1-6010 and Atom S1260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT3b | FCBGA1283 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 8.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Atom S1260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Atom S1260 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Atom S1260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and Atom S1260 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E1-6010 and Atom S1260 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Atom S1260.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 8 |
| PCI support | no data | PCI Support |
| UART | no data | UART |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 11 December 2012 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 8 Watt |
E1-6010 has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
Atom S1260, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E1-6010 and Atom S1260.
Be aware that E1-6010 is a notebook processor while Atom S1260 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Atom S1260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
