Atom D425 vs E1-6010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-6010
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.34
+162%
Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.13

E1-6010 outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30813349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.221.23
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$993

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

E1-6010 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsIntel GMA 3150
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and Atom D425.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-6010 0.34
+162%
Atom D425 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 534
+162%
Atom D425 204

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.13
Recency 29 April 2014 21 June 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

E1-6010 has a 161.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The E1-6010 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D425 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 562 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.