A4-1350 vs E1-6010

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-6010
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.33
A4-1350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.57
+72.7%

A4-1350 outperforms E1-6010 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and A4-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31332885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency3.146.79
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)18 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and A4-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz1 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and A4-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bFT3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and A4-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and A4-1350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and A4-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare HD 8210 and R2 Graphics
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8210 (300 MHz)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and A4-1350 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and A4-1350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and A4-1350.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E1-6010 0.33
A4-1350 0.57
+72.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 537
A4-1350 911
+69.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.57
Recency 29 April 2014 18 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

E1-6010 has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A4-1350, on the other hand, has a 72.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

The A4-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-6010 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
AMD A4-1350
A4-1350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 571 vote

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate A4-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E1-6010 and A4-1350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.