Microsoft SQ1 vs E1-2500

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiencyno data0.12
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache1024 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt3000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8240Qualcomm Adreno 685
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-2500 593
Microsoft SQ1 5822
+882%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E1-2500 1052
+95.9%
Microsoft SQ1 537

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E1-2500 2016
Microsoft SQ1 4276
+112%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E1-2500 79.6
Microsoft SQ1 14.2
+461%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 2 October 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 3000 Watt

E1-2500 has 19900% lower power consumption.

Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2500 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-2500
E1-2500
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 110 votes

Rate E1-2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-2500 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.