Celeron 6205 vs E1-2500
Primary details
Comparing E1-2500 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD E-Series | Intel Tiger Lake |
Architecture codename | Kabini (2013−2014) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E1-2500 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E1-2500 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FT3 | BGA1499 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2500 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2500 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2500 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 8240 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E1-2500 and Celeron 6205 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E1-2500 and Celeron 6205 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2500 and Celeron 6205.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.64 | 4.55 |
Recency | 23 May 2013 | 1 September 2020 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Celeron 6205 has 610.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between E1-2500 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2500 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.