Apple M1 Max vs E1-2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-2500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.37
Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
13.91
+3659%

Apple M1 Max outperforms E1-2500 by a whopping 3659% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-2500 and M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3036534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesApple M-Series
Power efficiency2.33no data
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)no data
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-2500 and M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads210
Base clock speedno data2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cacheno data2.9 MB
L2 cache1024 KB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E1-2500 and M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT3no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-2500 and M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-2500 and M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-2500 and M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8240Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-2500 and M1 Max integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-2500 and M1 Max integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-2500 and M1 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-2500 0.37
Apple M1 Max 13.91
+3659%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-2500 593
Apple M1 Max 22098
+3626%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

E1-2500 44
Apple M1 Max 1691
+3743%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

E1-2500 27
Apple M1 Max 200
+641%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 13.91
Recency 23 May 2013 18 October 2021
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 10
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 Max has a 3659.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-2500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-2500 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-2500
E1-2500
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 115 votes

Rate E1-2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 692 votes

Rate M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-2500 or M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.