Athlon II X3 400e vs E1-1500

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data1.75
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Rana (2009−2011)
Release date6 January 2013 (11 years ago)20 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.48 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm45 nm
Die size75 mm2169 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallAM3
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-1500 398
Athlon II X3 400e 1320
+232%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-1500 108
Athlon II X3 400e 276
+156%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-1500 191
Athlon II X3 400e 727
+281%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2013 20 October 2009
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

E1-1500 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X3 400e, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

We couldn't decide between E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1500 and Athlon II X3 400e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1500
E1-1500
AMD Athlon II X3 400e
Athlon II X3 400e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 161 vote

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 17 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 400e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1500 or Athlon II X3 400e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.