Processor N97 vs E1-1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E1-1200
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.24
Processor N97
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
3.49
+1354%

Processor N97 outperforms E1-1200 by a whopping 1354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E1-1200 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31781543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.2627.51
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-1200 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-1200 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

E1-1200 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7310Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1200 and Processor N97.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E1-1200 0.24
Processor N97 3.49
+1354%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E1-1200 912
Processor N97 5445
+497%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E1-1200 1682
Processor N97 15323
+811%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E1-1200 874
Processor N97 6461
+640%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E1-1200 76
Processor N97 16.82
+352%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E1-1200 1
Processor N97 6
+1026%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

E1-1200 0.27
Processor N97 1.94
+619%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

E1-1200 418
Processor N97 2321
+456%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 3.49
Integrated graphics card 0.33 2.32
Recency 6 June 2012 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 12 Watt

Processor N97 has a 1354.2% higher aggregate performance score, 603% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Processor N97 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1200
E1-1200
Intel Processor N97
Processor N97

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 293 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 202 votes

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1200 or Processor N97, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.