Celeron M U3600 vs E1-1200

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.26no data
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)18 December 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7310no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 18 December 2010
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm

E1-1200 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and Celeron M U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-1200
E1-1200
Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 293 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-1200 or Celeron M U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.