Celeron G6900TE vs E1-1200
Primary details
Comparing E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2140 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.04 |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 6 June 2012 (12 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 7310 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 June 2012 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
E1-1200 has 94.4% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E1-1200 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E1-1200 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
