Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs E-450

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-450
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.48
+11.6%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43

E-450 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28952958
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency2.521.16
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Merom-2M (2008)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallP
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6320no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-450 0.48
+11.6%
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 0.43

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-450 2021
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 2725
+34.9%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-450 64.5
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 47
+37.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.43
Recency 22 August 2011 1 May 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

E-450 has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The E-450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Celeron Dual-Core T1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 538 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 285 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or Celeron Dual-Core T1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.