Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs E-350

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+10785%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms E-350 by a whopping 10785% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3147148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.4210.29
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)38
Threads276
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT1FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-350 0.27
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
+10785%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 422
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+10962%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 29.39
Recency 4 January 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 38
Threads 2 76
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 270 Watt

E-350 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has a 10785.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1800% more physical cores and 3700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8368Q is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.