Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs E-350

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.43
+1541%

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms E-350 by a whopping 1541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31471333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency1.4227.93
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm12 nm
Die size75 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-350 0.27
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.43
+1541%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 422
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7041
+1568%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-350 106
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 917
+765%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-350 182
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2630
+1345%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 4.43
Integrated graphics card 0.32 4.51
Recency 4 January 2011 8 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U has a 1540.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1309.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 143 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.