Atom E625CT vs E-350
Primary details
Comparing E-350 and Atom E625CT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Stellarton (2010) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 22 November 2010 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-350 and Atom E625CT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-350 and Atom E625CT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 | Intel BGA1466 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Atom E625CT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Atom E625CT are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Atom E625CT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | Intel GMA 600 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 22 November 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 3 Watt |
E-350 has an age advantage of 1 month, 100% more physical cores, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.
Atom E625CT, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E-350 and Atom E625CT. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Atom E625CT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
