Xeon w5-2545 vs E-300
Primary details
Comparing E-300 and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 183 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 83.29 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 11.83 |
Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
Release date | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $889 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
E-300 and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 24 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 30 MB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on E-300 and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT1 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
E-300 and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-300 and Xeon w5-2545.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 22 August 2011 | 24 August 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
Threads | 2 | 24 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 210 Watt |
E-300 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between E-300 and Xeon w5-2545. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-300 is a notebook processor while Xeon w5-2545 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.