Atom N435 vs E-300

Place in the ranking	3199	3371
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD E-Series	Atom
Power efficiency	1.10	1.89
Architecture codename	Zacate (2011−2013)	Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date	22 August 2011 (13 years ago)	2 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-300 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	2
Boost clock speed	1.3 GHz	1.33 GHz
Bus rate	no data	533 MHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	40 nm	45 nm
Die size	75 mm²	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on E-300 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FT1	FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon HD 6310

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-300 0.21
+110%

Atom N435 0.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-300 339
+122%

Atom N435 153

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.21	0.10
Recency	22 August 2011	2 June 2011
Physical cores	2	1
Chip lithography	40 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	5 Watt

E-300 has a 110% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, 100% more physical cores, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N435, on the other hand, has 260% lower power consumption.

The E-300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N435 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Atom N435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.